skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 7:00 AM ET to 7:30 AM ET on Friday, April 24 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • Home
  • Search Results
  • Page 1 of 1

Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Parekh, Kunaal"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ; ; ; ; ; (, ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review)
    GPU sharing between workloads is an e!ective approach to increase GPU utilization and reduce idle power waste. To minimize resource contention under GPU sharing, current architectures allow users to allocate core GPU compute resources exclusively to workloads. However, identifying the most e''cient GPU compute resource allocation for colocated workloads is challenging, as it requires balancing potential performance degradation and power savings. This paper presents a framework for finding the most energy-e''cient compute allocation for colocated workload pairs under NVIDIA MPS using lightweight prediction models. Experimental results, using a range of training, inference, and general CUDA workloads, demonstrate that our solution outperforms the equal sharing strategy by 35%, on average, and is within 1.5% of the o#ine optimal strategy. 
    more » « less
    Full Text Available